The
world is waiting for its leaders to take action
on climate change, and the decisive days will be
this coming December, in Copenhagen, Denmark. It
is hoped that the nations of the world, industrialized
and developing, will be able to reach an accord
on curbing CO2 emissions; debatable points include
modifications of the Kyoto Protocol or absolution
in favor of a new treaty, whether targets are binding
or non binding, and the use of cap and trade programs
such as the program in the European Union.
Yet
another significant component of climate treaty
negotiations regards the issue of emission through
deforestation and carbon credit schemes, often called
REDD
(Reduced Emissions through Deferred Deforestation).
Approximately one fifth of all global carbon emissions
come from land use change and deforestation in tropical
countries, primarily Brasil and Indonesia. REDD
programs are voluntary under the Kyoto Protocol,
meaning that governments do not get official credit
for reduction of pollution. However, some governments
and polluting companies have undertaken conservation
programs that offer payments with the aim of avoiding
deforestation; most of these are focused on tropical,
developing countries. (see articles in The_Washington_Post
and The_Economist)
The_Amazon_Fund,
initiated by the government of Brasil, is another
type of program, which aims to collect donations
from developed countries to use as incentives for
tropical countries to prevent deforestation. However,
the Amazon Fund does not allow the developed countries
to use these donations to offset their pollution.
Another
story all together are reforestation programs, where
carbon is sequestered from the atmosphere during
tree growth. However, reforestation often occurs
in monoculture timber plantations of exotic, fast
growing species such as eucalyptus and pine. While
this type of reforestation sequesters carbon from
the environment, it provides little value to biodiversity,
sometimes in fact proving detrimental, if a primary
rainforest is logged and reforested into a timber
plantation. Reforestation credits are allowed under
the Kyoto Protocol, but few plans have yet to be
implemented.
Deforestation
and reforestation are important issues for us in
Ecuador and at our botanical garden. We would like
to see rainforest conservation implemented as a
means to reduce emissions from deforestation. Programs
such as the Amazon Fund and Ecuador’s Yasuni_–_ITT_initiative,
which provide monetary incentives to protect primary
rainforest should be supported, although long-term
independent monitoring and evaluation are crucial.
As Ecuador has gone through half a dozen presidents
in the last decade, it is easy to see why many doubt
the sustainability of President Correa’s plan. Nevertheless,
an understanding of the value of the Amazon is not
lost on anyone, and the local popularity of the
term “lungs of the world” attests to this fact.
At
our botanical garden, we are doing our part to sequester
a few tons of carbon: we are in negotiations to
acquire and reforest 25 hectares of our neighbors
land. After almost 30 years of restoration and every
week which passes by with visits from monkeys, sloths,
and other mammals, we find that our reserve is just
a tiny drop of the habitat needed to protect the
biodiversity of the Amazon. We plan to use our restoration
expertise to rehabilitate this neighboring terrain
of pasture (just as ours once was), grow a forest,
and conserve a seed bank of threatened Amazonian
plants. To donate money for a few trees or to just
inquire about restoration, write to us or visit,
jblorquideas@gmail.com |